Register date: 02/03/2022
Voshevaz, Kotayk, Armenia
fast file siteCompared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud must be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible. File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).Webhard It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. 웹하드 순위 Continuous streaming can be done only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only has to be in a folder.You should share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos.According to the report, there is a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It's far better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***It is extremely specialized in playing music. Specifically, it's the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point)It includes a large capacity. It is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services all together, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is contained in a document, it is rarely opened properly.Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. So when it's in that state, you need to discover the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)Google DriveIt exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you focus on can continue being reflected in the cloud in real time. This is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail.Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite). Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me. There are probably the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it's a block after a lot of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it's the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Is it obvious?)DropboxIt exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify before start of playback. It is the best in the world with regards to media reading.There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc. The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster than the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.The file capacity limit that may be uploaded from the free account may be the largest. 300MB. The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...There exists a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected in real time when working on documents.Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents. The dropbox itself cannot be documented.There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. To be able to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely. Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can also be flipped on the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file. File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little usage of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.Slow. Not paid people. Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported. If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it's much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***SkydriveThe writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.